One of your best here. On Israel, I am with Avivi.
As for that deep Democratic bench, it makes it easy to see why they've held onto Joe Biden at all costs for so long. Of course, now, they've no good choices at all.
With respect to climate, news reporters would be better off familiarizing themselves with the views of the best critics of climate catastrophism -- Judith Curry, Roger Pielke, Jr., Freeman Dyson, Bjorn Lomborg, Richard Lindzen, etc. Once they show some familiarity with the views of these and other skeptics, (along with the actual IPCC science reports, not the p.r. policy statements), they'd be doing their jobs and might help. Otherwise, journalists, please spare us the effort either to "elicit an emotional response" or "tell us how to act." It's not your job.
Agree that this is one of your best.
The link to the Daily Israel Briefing is very much appreciated. Great interview especially at the 6 minute mark.
And of all the Democrat prospective runners named, you left out the elephant in the room, Michelle Obama.
As to , “What If We’re Telling the Wrong Story About Climate Change,” I think the right story is discussion of the free rider problem.
I live in New York City with 8 million population, representing one-tenth of one percent of the earth's 8 billion population.
Yet the City taxes its population to reduce its carbon footprint while the other 99.9% of the earth's population do not share in the cost.
This is crazy.
One of your best here. On Israel, I am with Avivi.
As for that deep Democratic bench, it makes it easy to see why they've held onto Joe Biden at all costs for so long. Of course, now, they've no good choices at all.
With respect to climate, news reporters would be better off familiarizing themselves with the views of the best critics of climate catastrophism -- Judith Curry, Roger Pielke, Jr., Freeman Dyson, Bjorn Lomborg, Richard Lindzen, etc. Once they show some familiarity with the views of these and other skeptics, (along with the actual IPCC science reports, not the p.r. policy statements), they'd be doing their jobs and might help. Otherwise, journalists, please spare us the effort either to "elicit an emotional response" or "tell us how to act." It's not your job.