Just to be clear (I probably should have been more explicit about this in the article) I don’t really want Trump to take it over, my preference would be for the people in charge of it now to run it in a way that it’s not a chaotic homeless shelter/drug den.
Why should the federal government take over Boston’s South Station unless it will also do the same thing for similarly situated stations throughout the country?
You would have been as supportive of Biden or Obama doing the same here in Boston, Chicago or in red state counties with high rates of violent crime?
Just to be clear (I probably should have been more explicit about this in the article) I don’t really want Trump to take it over, my preference would be for the people in charge of it now to run it in a way that it’s not a chaotic homeless shelter/drug den.
Why should the federal government take over Boston’s South Station unless it will also do the same thing for similarly situated stations throughout the country?
Is Boston's North Station different, and if so why?
Would a rail link between South Station and North Station (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North%E2%80%93South_Rail_Link) improve the situation?