Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Greenberg's avatar

"...What Obama showed with his body language was that Trump, for all his flaws..."

Nope. What Obama showed was that it was all an act that snookered a lot of people into believing things about Trump that were not true. The Editor included.

Michael Segal's avatar

There is a sloid argument that Zuckerberg's move towards freer speech is sincere, not kow-towing to President Trump.

Recall Zuckerberg's Georgetown speech in 2019, which titled towards free speech:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-stands-for-free-expression-11571336089

That move was in a good direction, but at the time I suggested a more community-based approach: https://www.wsj.com/articles/zuckerbergs-plan-for-free-speech-on-facebook-11571851017

"Mark Zuckerberg is wise to have decided that “Facebook shouldn’t be making so many important decisions about speech on its own” (“Facebook Stands for Free Expression,” op-ed, Oct. 18). But his plan to establish an “independent Oversight Board” is another variant of such central control, and very off-brand for a social network.

Instead, Facebook should allow a variety of independent overseers to rate material on its platform, and then let users choose which raters to take seriously and which to ignore. Don’t burden Facebook with making these judgment calls; let the people decide."

Zuckerberg was under huge pressure from the Biden administration to censor:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mark-zuckerberg-joe-rogan-biden-officials-scream-curse-facebook-rcna187199

"Headline: Mark Zuckerberg says Biden officials would 'scream' and 'curse' when seeking removal of Facebook content"

So it is entirely plausible that Zuckerberg was on the free speech side all along, but needed ideas from others, including Elon Musk, as to good ways to accomplish it safely.

No posts

Ready for more?