Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Segal's avatar

A key question on the agenda is whether Israel should allow foreign journalists into Gaza.

Pro: A journalist could come for 2 weeks, leave and then from safety outside of Gaza report hair-raising stories such as recounted here.

Con: The journalists and those who talk with them would be coerced into reporting only pro-Hamas stories. Even once they leave, their news organizations would fear losing access in the future. And many of the reporters and news organizations would value helping Hamas over hardnosed reporting; it is no accident that many of us are learning about the hospital interrogation centers in The Editors and not The New York Times.

Does the pro or con approach makes more sense?

Are there other approaches, such as finding ways for average Gazans to tell their stories directly to outsiders without being coerced by Hamas?

David Weinkrantz's avatar

“Socialism has never worked anywhere in the world. Our country is built on capitalism, and that has served us well for almost 250 years.”

I don't know if China is now classified as socialist, but it performs well in many ways.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?