Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Segal's avatar

As noted in Ira Stoll's FAFSA WSJ article , the law about FAFSA "now says that “in order to be eligible for Federal financial aid,” the applicant “shall provide” information about “Race or ethnicity.”"

Note the wording "shall". As detailed at https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/conversational/shall-and-must/ using the term "shall" instead of "must" merely suggests an action, but does not impose a requirement. This is why there the “prefer not to answer” option that the Stolls chose.

Ira Stoll is correct that the FAFSA form should not collect information about race or ethnicity, but until the law is changed a question about this must be on the form, though no answer can be required. In the meantime, people should choose the option "prefer not to answer". When there is an option to write in an answer, I've chosen "nonracist".

Michael Segal's avatar

Note the difference between Trump's formulation of releasing the hostages and Avivi's formulation of a hostage "deal". Trump puts the responsibility on Hamas to act unilaterally, while Avivi hints at Israel making some concessions without specifying what those concessions will be.

Will Israel have to release thousands of security prisoners? Will Israel have to re-open the Philadelphi corridor and its Rafah crossing to renewed arms smuggling from Egypt? Will the security arrangement be such that Hamas can return to power?

The details matter. We need to ask those who refer to a "hostage deal" without specifying the quid pro quo what they mean. Are they being capitulationists and sweeping under the rug concessions that will endanger Israel for many decades into the future?

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?